Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [ISN] Technology Firm With Ties to Microsoft Fires Executive Over Criticism
From: Paul Robichaux <paul () robichaux net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:41:03 -0400
I erred in saying that Geer represented himself, or the report, as speaking for @stake. There's a lot more that I'm tempted to say, but I think Roberta Bragg said it better in her column yesterday. Rather than muddle her arguments, I refer interested readers to http://mcpmag.com/security; the column's not posted there yet but should be shortly. Cheers, -Paul
From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org> Reply-To: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 05:18:54 -0500 (CDT) To: isn () attrition org Subject: Re: [ISN] Technology Firm With Ties to Microsoft Fires Executive Over Criticism Forwarded from: Jason Coombs <jasonc () science org> Cc: paul () robichaux net;, Dan_Verton () computerworld com;, rforno () infowarrior org;, full-disclosure () lists netsys com InfoSec News wrote:Forwarded from: Paul Robichaux <paul () robichaux net> 1. Geer claimed to be speaking for @stake. He wasn't.I do hope that all of you actually read the report before forming any opinions about it, the people who wrote it, or the manner in which those people portrayed themselves as authors of it. It is simply impossible to interpret Geer's role in authoring this report as anything close to "speaking for @Stake" -- it was clearly the "speaking" part that got him canned, and one need not be paranoid in order to see Microsoft's direct or indirect influence in the growing "punishment for speech" phenomenon within the United States. @Stake's own political bias in advancing the so-called "responsible disclosure" process is a crucial element of criminalizing speech... We can't put speakers in prison unless we can prove that they violated the rules with their speech, so @Stake is busy trying to define the rules. The whole business makes me feel sick. What we really need is freedom, and the ability to defend ourselves adequately from anyone who might choose to exercise theirs in a way that doesn't conform to other people's arbitrary definition of "responsible". There was a time in the past when there was little doubt that we had freedom. Freedom must be one of the costs of monopoly. CyberInsecurity: The Cost of Monopoly How the Dominance of Microsoft's Products Poses a Risk to Security http://www.ccianet.org/papers/cyberinsecurity.pdf Sincerely, Jason Coombs jasonc () science org - ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org To unsubscribe email majordomo () attrition org with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY of the mail.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: [ISN] Technology Firm With Ties to Microsoft Fires Executive Over Criticism Jason Coombs (Sep 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [ISN] Technology Firm With Ties to Microsoft Fires Executive Over Criticism Paul Robichaux (Sep 30)