Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: BugTraq Speed
From: Michael Ablassmeier <abi () rubyforen de>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:30:16 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi Rainer, On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:39:27PM +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
I wonder if someone else is sharing this experience? If so, one would be tempted to suspect that Symantec is deliberately delaying delivery, e.g. to give its premium customers a head start. There have been a lot of rumors recently, and this would fit in nicely...
i almost can share this experience with you. I've unsubscribed Bugraq a few weeks ago, because i think, this list is better to discuss things, even if they are not <only> security related. I did not keep an eye on every flaw which was reported, but sometimes, it seems indeed that f-d is more reliable (faster). Hm. This should not become an Bugraq vs. f-d flame ;-) bye, - michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/cf7YEFV7g4B8rCURAgZZAJ9VBSoHMxXx1lWNucy8afx+RAiZWwCgzUKo u2kRZEvVASUXcM6f9J9v4gM= =O3/G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- BugTraq Speed Rainer Gerhards (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Henrik Edlund (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Michael Ablassmeier (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Jeremiah Cornelius (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Michael Renzmann (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Raj Mathur (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Michael Renzmann (Sep 25)
- Re: BugTraq Speed morning_wood (Sep 25)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Raj Mathur (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Cael Abal (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 24)
- Re: BugTraq Speed Rick Updegrove (Sep 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: BugTraq Speed Brown, Rodrick (Sep 24)
- RE: BugTraq Speed dunc sec (Sep 24)
(Thread continues...)