Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Erm, Excuse Me, Honeynet....
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:08:06 -0400
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:57:02 PDT, Jeremiah Cornelius said:
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 15:12, Vinadvertentlyks () vt edu wrote:On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:15:05 PDT, Jeremiah Cornelius said:Sounds like a case for DMCA violation to me...And the copy-protection technology that was circumvented was what, exactly?Sorry. The subtle <smirk> tags were inadvertantly left from my message...
Oh darn. I was *so* hoping that the original file was in a password-protected .ZIP file or something - even ROT13 would have been enough, as Skylarov found out. If there HAD been a DMCA issue, the lawyers would get rich, and the bystanders would be well entertained. It would have been interesting seeing how a John Doe plaintiff quantified damages in a copyright suit... ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Erm, Excuse Me, Honeynet...., (continued)
- Re: Erm, Excuse Me, Honeynet.... V.O. (Sep 23)
- Just when you thought Macafee stuff was safe! gregh (Sep 23)
- Re: Just when you thought Macafee stuff was safe! Keith W. McCammon (Sep 23)
- Re: Just when you thought Macafee stuff was safe! gregh (Sep 23)
- RE: Just when you thought Macafee stuff was safe! Jeroen Massar (Sep 23)
- Re: Just when you thought Macafee stuff was safe! gregh (Sep 23)
- Re: Erm, Excuse Me, Honeynet.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 23)
- Re: Erm, Excuse Me, Honeynet.... Jeremiah Cornelius (Sep 23)
- Re: Erm, Excuse Me, Honeynet.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 24)
- Re: Erm, Excuse Me, Honeynet.... Jeremiah Cornelius (Sep 23)