Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Verisign "responds"
From: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <jonathan () nuclearelephant com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:26:20 -0400
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 21:25, Macroscape Solutions wrote:
I think to be fare to Verisign and the other registrar's they at least should have links to GoDaddy and the likes to register the nonexistent domain. They should spread the wealth....if they won't suspend the service.
To be "fair" to everyone, the community should be in control of the top-level domains, and not commercial organizations - nobody ever expected the Internet to grow so huge (not even Al Gore). So initially having a government-run agency was a good temporary solution, but now that everything is commercialized, we need to fix what's broken...and what's broken is the monopoly on TLDs. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Verisign "responds" J. Race (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Geoff Shively (Sep 22)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Sven Kraemer (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Gregory A. Gilliss (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Verisign "responds" David Vincent (Sep 23)
- RE: Verisign "responds" Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Macroscape Solutions (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Stormwalker (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign "responds" Geoff Shively (Sep 22)