Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored"

From: Brian <bmc () snort org>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:24:54 -0400

On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:22:03AM -0700, joeypork () hushmail com wrote:

I guess now that we have this incident validated as positively true from
the main Snort/SourceFire IT person, it lends a lot of credibility to
the Snort/SourceFire "backdoor" rumor.


No, it does not.  Did you read my email?

I said this was OLD news.  A LONG time ago.  We published our findings on
snort.org a LONG time ago.  Your assumptions are all wrong.

Grow up already.  

-brian

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Current thread:

Re: Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored" joeypork (Sep 21)
- Snort not backdoored, Sourcefire not compromised Martin Roesch (Sep 21)
  - RE: Snort not backdoored, Sourcefire not compromised Exibar (Sep 22)
    - RE: Snort not backdoored, Sourcefire not compromised Daniele Muscetta (Sep 22)
    - Message not available
    - Re: [Snort-users] RE: Snort not backdoored, Sourcefire not compromised Daniele Muscetta (Sep 22)
  - Re: Snort not backdoored, Sourcefire not compromised Andreas Marx (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored" joeypork (Sep 21)
  - Re: Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored" Brian (Sep 21)
    - Re: [Snort-users] Re: Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored" Peteris Krumins (Sep 21)
  - Re: [Snort-users] Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored" Richard DeYoung (Sep 22)
- Re: Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored" whatthefukever (Sep 22)