Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims
From: "Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro" <lorenzohgh () nsrg-security com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:16:07 +0200
Thanks for the info. Yeah , i will correct the encoded header ( comment ) now. But , it's easy to identify the encoding in first view: 1.-browsers doesn't support real time page encryption because for it you must choose javascript...so currently are not available fast methods to encrypt pages in real time and keep the key of encryption secure. There are libraries like MD5-JS,SHA1-JS , etc for do encryption in one way: client->client not server->client. 2.-The javascript functions uses simple encoding standard code , that can be identified with a minimal JS Knowledge. Best regards to all ;-) , PS: I'm working in a md5 file hash system for pages ( yo keep the md5 hashes in a secure file and a script compares the hashes to the file hashes for check hacked pages or trojaniced php scripts , a new form to attack servers that i will to explain in my next paper UWAHCK ). ----- Original Message ----- From: "petard" <petard () sdf lonestar org> To: "Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro" <lorenzohgh () nsrg-security com> Cc: "Full-Disclosure" <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:05:35PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
wrote:
Dear Paul, I've testing your exploit ( good one ) for the supposed html encryption
weak
of SaS. I think yo toke the exploit/perl script from a developers site because
SaS
is using an standard of encoding, here is the proof : variables for function _fwk_filter_encrypt($content) $table =
"0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ_@";
$xor = 165; as you see it's not encryption , so , you didn't cracked nothing.... you decoded it !Then perhaps you'd like to correct your site. In your source code, you
write:
<!-- Web Site desing by Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro--><!-- Encrypted
using S
ecurity Application Server of No Secure Root Group Security Research --> It would appear that Paul was only quoting your term ("encryption" was
enclosed
in quotation marks within his mail) rather than indicating that he really considered it to be encryption. FWIW, it's completely useless to encode your content in this way. Try an even simpler exercise: [my version of the "exploit", if you will] 1. Visit your site in a browser (I used Mozilla 1.5) 2. Choose "Select All" from the "Edit" menu. 3. Right-click and choose "View Selection Source". regards, petard
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro (Oct 15)
- Re: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims petard (Oct 15)
- Re: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro (Oct 15)
- Re: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims KF (Oct 15)
- Re: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 15)
- Re: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims Nick FitzGerald (Oct 16)
- Re: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 15)
- Re: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims petard (Oct 15)