Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:47:31 -0500
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:21:56 MST, Stephen Blass <Stephen.Blass () asu edu> said:
> the fixes preceded the exploit. and pigs fly
From RFC1925:
(3) With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Jeremiah Cornelius (Oct 31)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Exibar (Oct 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Stephen Blass (Oct 31)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 31)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Kenneth R. van Wyk (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Peter Moody (Oct 31)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Robert Ahnemann (Oct 31)