Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security
From: Jeremiah Cornelius <jeremiah () nur net>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:08:19 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 <SNIP>
To support this, take red-hat on the s390 platform; red-hat pushes out the product, which IBM is the back channel support for. I ask in the very first meeting with the red-hat sales-lizard;
<SNIP> No that it helps your support situation, but the core zSeries work was a skunkworks project - IBMers in Europe and some SuSE guys. RedHat does a good packaging job - but my impression is that they are patch integrators on 390/z - not patch creators. It's worth investigating SuSE for comparative platform support- that certainly seems to be IBM's preferred route on the VMs: http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/os/linux/ - -- Jeremiah Cornelius, CISSP, CCNA, MCSE farm9 Information Security email: jc () farm9 com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/mFFaJi2cv3XsiSARAsXpAJ9GY1CMW7MI8tFBs2KhqWSKyXSIpQCg+aBD AaIm/HACkFTqJSQFtcJKfpQ= =P7fC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security, (continued)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Cael Abal (Oct 22)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Peter Busser (Oct 23)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Curt Purdy (Oct 22)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Michal Zalewski (Oct 22)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Curt Purdy (Oct 23)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Michal Zalewski (Oct 23)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security William Warren (Oct 23)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Jeremiah Cornelius (Oct 23)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 23)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Andy Wood (Oct 23)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 23)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Dan Wilder (Oct 23)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 23)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Peter Busser (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Shawn McMahon (Oct 24)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Arcturus (Oct 23)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Peter Busser (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Shawn McMahon (Oct 24)