Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject)
From: Darren Reed <avalon () caligula anu edu au>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:51:44 +1000 (Australia/ACT)
In some mail from Bruce Ediger, sie said:
The real questions go something like: "Source code for Unix viruses has been available for years, from sources almost too numerous to mention. Why haven't Unix viruses become epidemic the way that Windows viruses have?"
How quickly we forget "modern" history...but then my guess is that most of the people who do IT security today are...<rant deleted> I found this quickly via google: http://legacy.eos.ncsu.edu/eos/info/computer_ethics/abuse/wvt/worm/lecture.html There are numerous differences between that worm and the ones we have taking out servers left right and centre, today. If the worm programmers of today were half as capable as the author of that worm, we'd be in a LOT more trouble. But what you've got to realise is this... the network that makes these attacks possible is the very same network that miscreants have to use (mostly) to chat with peers, get their daily intake of warez, porn, music, etc. so to make the 'net unusable is to also deny themselves some enjoyment (well that's my theory anyway :)
To extend your "wooden house" analogy a bit:
This was just another bad analogy. I'd encourage people to stop using analogies and just exlpain whatever it is in 'native' terms. Darren _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Re: No Subject, (continued)
- Re: Re: No Subject Frank Knobbe (Oct 21)
- Re: Re: No Subject Michal Zalewski (Oct 21)
- Re: Re: No Subject Bradford Shedwick (Oct 21)
- Re: Re: No Subject Frank Knobbe (Oct 21)
- Re: Re: No Subject Michal Zalewski (Oct 21)
- Re: Re: No Subject Paul Schmehl (Oct 21)
- Re: Re: No Subject Byron Copeland (Oct 21)
- Re: Re: No Subject Peter Busser (Oct 22)
- Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Peter Busser (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Bruce Ediger (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Darren Reed (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Gary Flynn (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Paul Schmehl (Oct 22)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) George Capehart (Oct 23)