Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: defense against session hijacking
From: Damian Gerow <damian () sentex net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:05:42 -0500
Thus spake Frank Knobbe (frank () knobbe us) [17/11/03 18:01]:
I think David was hinting at pooled NAT address. Image an internal network that gets NATed to addresses a.b.c.d.5 until a.b.c.d.12. Kinda like Gary's "ganged" proxies.
Ah, okay. That makes a little more sense. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- defense against session hijacking Thomas M. Duffey (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Gary E. Miller (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Ron DuFresne (Nov 19)
- Re: defense against session hijacking David Maynor (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Damian Gerow (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Frank Knobbe (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Damian Gerow (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking David Maynor (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Damian Gerow (Nov 17)
- window hiding sir kaber (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking |reduced|minus|none| (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Gary E. Miller (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Scott Taylor (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Bill Pennington (Nov 17)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Jason Ziemba (Nov 18)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Tim (Nov 18)
- Re: defense against session hijacking Jakob Lell (Nov 19)
- Message not available
- Re: defense against session hijacking flatline (Nov 19)