Re: why commcerical software *could* be better

[Gadi Evron <ge () egotistical reprehensible net>]

> Once upon a time there was no possibility to examine object code.
> Little Red Riding Hood and her Wolf guarded all object code from
> being decompiled, disassembled and debugged by the Grandma. And
> they all lived happily ever after.

I never said there ISN'T, but it means that not EVERY kid in the block can.

Also, let me stress *again* that my examples were _not_ about Microsoft.

There is more to the world about Microsoft, if you claim to "hate" it so 
much, for whatever reasons you may have, stop talking about it all the 
time. Use software that you like, whatever that may be, and leave the 
rest of the world alone.

> > I can come up with a few more.
> Thank you very much, that was enough already.

This just comes to prove the point I emailed against earlier this week.

There can be no serious discussion on this mailing list without extra 
chatter, trolls and flames.

I am actually all for open-source, but at least I do not blind myself to 
the world.

> VB.
--
      Gadi Evron (i.e. ge),
      ge () linuxbox org.

The Trojan Horses Research mailing list - http://ecompute.org/th-list

My resume (Hebrew) - http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/resume.rtf

PGP key for ge () linuxbox org -
http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron.asc
Note: this key is used mainly for files and attachments, I sign email 
messages using:
http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron_sign.asc


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html