Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security
From: George Capehart <capegeo () opengroup org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:59:51 -0500
On Sunday 02 November 2003 07:01 pm, Geoincidents wrote: <snip>
I don't see it that way. I think that as a function to run network backups windows has one of the more secure ways to make connections between machines. I think MS needs to stop claiming this isn't feature for the internet and realize that there is no difference between the internet and the internal network, both require security unless you somehow don't think the payroll system requires security..
Apparently the folks at Microsoft aren't there yet . . . would *you* be willing to expose a stored procedure in a SQL Server database as a Web service? See http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/33718.html. The inmates are running the loony bin . . . /g -- George Capehart "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security, (continued)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Beaty, Bryan (Oct 31)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security james (Oct 31)
- RE: [spam] RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Exibar (Nov 01)
- udp port 2615 Trond Kringstad (Nov 01)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Cedric Blancher (Nov 01)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security William Warren (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Matthew Murphy (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Matthew Murphy (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security George Capehart (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security George Capehart (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 04)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 04)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Dave Howe (Nov 04)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security George Capehart (Nov 04)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Beaty, Bryan (Oct 31)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Nick FitzGerald (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Frank Knobbe (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' forgood security Lan Guy (Nov 03)