RE: Re: Please Vote Today

["Benjamin Meade" <ben () lanwest com au>]

Well said.

Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of
aliver () xexil com
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 3:26 PM
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: Please Vote Today

> I've created a poll to address this "Morning Wood" issue.

        I'm surprised. I expected more from you, Len. Did you really
create this list with the belief that a few immature or unsavory
individuals wouldn't attempt to grandstand and act the fool next to
legitimate researchers? If you didn't consider this possibility then you
are naive'. If you did consider it, then make no mistake, you are now
vacillating on the tenability of an unmoderated security list.

> Quite a few people have been contacting us in regards to his behaviour
on
> the list and needless to say no small number of people have left the
list
> because of recent activity.

        These are people who are too ignorant or impatient to use
procmail
or their client's built in mail filtering (and heaven forbid they
actually
just _skip_ the message). I say, good riddance to bad rubbish. Even in
the
remote chance that they did actually have something to contribute, then
they would have eventually left anyway due to their prudish nature. This
list so far has been no-holds-barred, and there may well be a few smart
people who simply can't stand a pottymouth ... *shrug* not much to be
done
about that.

> http://www.netsys.com/cgi-bin/poll?pn=7

        Did you even take into consideration that the results of your
poll
will be totally inaccurate since all that's required to vote is a new
IP?
I have around 300 hosts with separate IP's at my disposal (legitimately)
and if I had a mind, I could easily alter the results. So also, could
any
number of other subscribers.

> We'll wait a week before taking any action.

        Hopefully, you'll realize what a silly idea this was and stick
to
your guns. Either support unmoderated full-disclosure or shut the list
down, get out of the way, and let someone with more fortitude make a
more
serious effort.

> Note: We can moderate individuals who are problematic but we are loath
to
> actually remove someone from the list because there is always hope for
> improvement.

        Personally, I'd rather someone be unsubscribed rather than
directly censor messages. If someone (like a few of the hush.com idiots)
were trying to DoS the list, then you unsubscribe them. They are not
trying to express themselves or discuss security, but rather
intentionally
attempting destroy the list with a blatant attack.
        Morning Wood is just an immature kid who, for some reason, wants
to participate in a discussion about 'security' and 'hacking' even
though
he doesn't have anything of substance to say. I for one either laugh at
or
delete the mail I get from him. If it really bothered me, I'd have
procmail filter it out as I do with more malicious posters.
        What puzzles me is that after all the list has been through, you
are only taking a real stand on this issue now? Is it due to the fact
that
people are leaving the list? If so, that's pretty weak. The slew of "oh
yeah I'm leaving too, yeah." shouldn't phase you. I encourage you to
keep
the list unmoderated even if it means you and I are the last goddamn
people to unsubscribe. Don't knuckle under just because a few lemmings
went and unsubscribed after a public display of their lack of mail
filtering skills.

> I am optimistic that if people can be made aware of their anti-social
> behaviour they often change for the better.  We're all human and we've
all
> got our faults!

        Don't be so optimistic, in this case. Some people will continue
to
make asses out of themselves and wrack the nerves of others who allow
themselves to be bothered. Moving forward, I think there is hope that
you
will realize that moderating or unsubscribing folks from this list
because
their posts are immature, inflammatory, or for any reason other than
they
are DoS'ing would mean that this is nothing more than a lower quality
Bugtraq. Moderation is moderation, regardless of how strict or liberal
the
moderator is, the posts are still subject to their discretion. The whole
reason I'm here is that the list is open to all without fear of
authoritarian moderation. I won't abide moderation here. I'm already
subscribed to Bugtraq. So please, don't get weak in the knees on me now.

aliver
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html