Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 12:19:38 -0400
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 10:49:40 EDT, Chris Paget said:
I agree completely that maybe the best way to stop all this is to make vendors liable for flaws in their products. I heard rumours that this was being considered in the US - anyone know what the score is?
Be careful what you ask for, you may get it. There be many nasty legal dragons here. Who gets to foot the bill if a security hole is found in an open source product like Apache? Or one that's just "3 guys in their living room"? It's going to be REALLY hard to write a law that prevents disclaimer of liability for a big software shop and still allows it for the average GPL software... Who pays if the vendor/author has already released a patch and people haven't upgraded? This is an important case - note that it's the rare worm that's gotten loose before the vendor has a patch....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c), (continued)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Paul Schmehl (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Knud Erik Højgaard (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Paul Schmehl (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Nathan Seven (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Neeko Oni (Jul 26)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Blue Boar (Jul 26)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) security snot (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Blue Boar (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Georgi Guninski (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Chris Paget (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) w g (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit w g (Jul 26)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Neeko Oni (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) tcpdumb (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) El Guille (Jul 27)