Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again )
From: Mark Lowes <hamster () korenwolf net>
Date: 14 Jul 2003 12:22:52 +0100
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 09:19, Roy S. Rapoport wrote: [...]
It sometimes feels as though this mailing list is populated by slashdotters, quick to shoot down ideas that are improvements over the current situation if they're not perfect. Is it better to do your own installation? Certainly. Is it better to do your own hardening? Again, obviously yes.
Agreed 100%
But the vast majority of people out there don't do either of these.
One of the problems is that there a non-trivial number of these people aren't capable of properly securing a machine. Anything a vendor does to try and improve the default baseline the better, as long as they don't block the option for those who wish to redo the box in their own style / to fit their own local security needs then more power to them and I hope it's enough of a success that other vendors follow. -- Mark Lowes <hamster () korenwolf net> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ), (continued)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Karl DeBisschop (Jul 01)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Ron DuFresne (Jul 03)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Peter Busser (Jul 04)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) morning_wood (Jul 04)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Nick FitzGerald (Jul 04)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Ron DuFresne (Jul 12)
- RE: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Scott (Jul 13)
- RE: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Ron DuFresne (Jul 13)
- RE: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Scott (Jul 13)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Roy S. Rapoport (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Mark Lowes (Jul 14)