Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Fwd: xbl vulnerabilty
From: martin f krafft <madduck () madduck net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:53:37 +0200
also sprach Martin Peikert <lists () nolog org> [2003.07.09.1109 +0200]:
So, IMHO at least you could tell the people that auto94042 () hushmail com found that vulnerability - it's *the author's* choice to give his real name, a name - do you think you can proof that? - or simply nothing. You _do have_ the email adress.
Yes, you have a point. I think the security team simply forgot this time around. I am sure it wasn't on purpose. I am not on the team, so don't take any of this for granted. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck invalid PGP subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! the remote desktop feature of windows xp is really nice (and *novel*!). a micro$oft consultant can *remotely* disable the personal firewall and control the system. we'll ignore the fact that this tampering with the firewall is not logged, and more importantly, that the firewall isn't restored when the clowns from redmond are done with their job.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Fwd: Re: xbl vulnerabilty auto94042 (Jul 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: xbl vulnerabilty auto94042 (Jul 08)
- Re: Fwd: xbl vulnerabilty martin f krafft (Jul 09)
- Re: Re: Fwd: xbl vulnerabilty Martin Peikert (Jul 09)
- Re: Re: Fwd: xbl vulnerabilty martin f krafft (Jul 09)
- Re: Re: Fwd: xbl vulnerabilty Steve Kemp (Jul 09)
- Re: Fwd: xbl vulnerabilty martin f krafft (Jul 09)
- Fwd: Re: xbl vulnerabilty auto94042 (Jul 09)