Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia)
From: Adam Shostack <adam () homeport org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:57:20 -0400
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:51:42PM -0400, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote: | This isn't full-disclosure, the last time I checked. To the best of | my knowledge, pen-test is a moderated list. Surely the moderator is | capable of noting the difference between "Your product sukz0rs" and | "The product proved unable to stand up to traffic above 100Mhz" - and | of passing the appropriate posting through, whether it has "John Doe" | or "thunderfallingdown" attached to it as a moniker. I believe that the more involved list moderation is, the more liability the company make take on. If the moderation is spam filtering, then the company might still be a common carrier. As soon as you lose that content neutrality, your moderation becomes active editing, and you take on new responsibilities. IANAL. That said, I wish that Al wouldn't take the view he's taken on obvious versus non-obvious pseudonyms. Adam -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia) Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Jul 07)
- Re: Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia) Adam Shostack (Jul 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia) cepacolmax (Jul 07)
- Re: Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia) Etaoin Shrdlu (Jul 08)
- Re: Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia) Nick FitzGerald (Jul 08)
- Re: Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia) security snot (Jul 08)
- Re: Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia) Etaoin Shrdlu (Jul 08)
- Re: Symantec Change Posting Criteria (was Re: Administrivia) cepacolmax (Jul 07)