Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: OT but related.
From: Shanphen Dawa <list () hardlined com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:38:29 -0500
I don't subscribe to bugtraq for the reasons you listed, vendor annoucing, and a lot of material that just isn't interesting to me. Usually there are a couple people subscribed to both, so if there is anything important posted to bugtraq, it usually gets reposted here. On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 03:34:14 +1000 (Australia/ACT) Darren Reed <avalon () caligula anu edu au> wrote:
I'm curious to know, does anyone subscribe to full-disclosure BUT NOT bugtraq ? Is there any material that currently appears on bugtraq that never appears on full-disclosure ? Is there anything that owners of full-disclsoure could do to bridge that gap, if it exists ? My personal current evaluation of the two lists is tending towards bugtraq being irrelevant, these days as it becomes more of a vendor-announce list (especially for Linux) than a useful forum to particpate in. Cheers, Darren _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-- /* "To avoid all evil, to cultivate good, and to cleanse one's mind this is the teaching of the Buddhas." Martin Ekendahl http://www.hardlined.com martin () hardlined com */ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- OT but related. Darren Reed (Jul 29)
- Re: OT but related. Shanphen Dawa (Jul 29)
- Re: OT but related. Jonathan Rickman (Jul 29)
- Re: OT but related. uidzer0 (Jul 29)
- Re: OT but related. Matthew Summers (Jul 29)
- Re: [mailinglists-security] OT but related. Remko Lodder (Jul 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: OT but related. John . Airey (Jul 30)
- RE: OT but related. John . Airey (Jul 31)