Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fw: Full Disclosure != Exploit Release - No disclosure No Fix
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:48:45 -0800
yossarian wrote:
Why do I get the feeling that we are running around in circles on these lists? Discussion just don't get settled, and the more experienced people get tired, and just lurk or leave.
Because we are going in circles. Much of the full disclosure debate is based on opinions, assumptions, or gut feeling. It's an incredibly complex topic, and we don't have near enough information to "prove" anyone's position. It comes up all the time because something happens that seems to lend weight to someone's side, or because some new form of pain occurs that makes people question whether it's worth it.
I don't mind participating in an intelligent debate on it from time to time, but don't expect anything to really be resolved. The kinds of studies that need to be done in this area are few and far between, and usually are to small in scope, due to lack of resources.
BB _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Fw: Full Disclosure != Exploit Release - No disclosure No Fix yossarian (Jan 29)
- Re: Fw: Full Disclosure != Exploit Release - No disclosure No Fix Blue Boar (Jan 29)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Was: Full Disclosure = Exploit Release - No disclosure No Fix yossarian (Jan 30)
- Re: Was: Full Disclosure = Exploit Release - No disclosure No Fix Blue Boar (Jan 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Fw: Full Disclosure != Exploit Release - No disclosure No Fix Blue Boar (Jan 29)