Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: GROUP CONSIDERING SUIT AGAINST MICROSOFT OVER SLAMMER VIRUS
From: Juraj Bednar <juraj () bednar sk>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:06:27 +0100
hello,
While I'm on the subject, is any1 else annoyed with RH 8.0?Annoyed by what? I'm running Phoebe (the 8.091 beta version).
he meant, that setting the liability precedent is quite important thing. if someone sues microsoft over security flaw and wins (even in korea), anyone can sue *insert your favourite os vendor name here* and win too. every software has bugs, making vendors liable is not a trivial thing. making vendors liable for not providing security fixes in timely manner is another thing (and maybe better). it's interesting in any case... Juraj. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- GROUP CONSIDERING SUIT AGAINST MICROSOFT OVER SLAMMER VIRUS Richard M. Smith (Feb 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: GROUP CONSIDERING SUIT AGAINST MICROSOFT OVER SLAMMER VIRUS Schmehl, Paul L (Feb 03)
- Re: GROUP CONSIDERING SUIT AGAINST MICROSOFT OVER SLAMMER VIRUS Juraj Bednar (Feb 03)
- Re: GROUP CONSIDERING SUIT AGAINST MICROSOFT OVER SLAMMER VIRUS Joerg Mayer (Feb 03)
- Re: GROUP CONSIDERING SUIT AGAINST MICROSOFT OVER SLAMMER VIRUS Juraj Bednar (Feb 03)