Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Global HIGH Security Risk
From: phenethyl () hushmail com
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:55:22 -0800
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, ^Shadown^ wrote:
Dear Folks, I'm sorry if anybody didn't like the subject, but is *that* important. While a research I've developed a technique to literaly bypass *every* security network software and device (*every* firewall, ids, etc), which become an unstopable security risk for the hole security community, but I don't know the legal term on how to post something like this. And I need help on this, need people who may advice me on how to share this information. I'm really scared, because i.e "The arrest that happends after the DEFCON X conference because of the *PDF security*", and I swear that this is a large *mayor* security risk. I will *NOT* answer any question about the new technique (the one I've developed and applied) until I get adviced on how to post it *without* getting in trouble, so please don't write to me because I'll delete them all. I hope for your help. Best Regards. ^Shadown^
sucking dick in exchange for access to boxen is not a new technique in fact prostitution is the oldest profession. however the danger this technique represents is indeed massive as most network administrators are sexually unfullfilled and have been that way for up to years at a time, and are usually quite willing to exchange root on their machines for shoving their cocks down your throat. i understand you have put much development into this technique but i assure you it is not new. be aware that prostitution is illegal in most places, and you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Big $$$ to be made with the HushMail Affiliate Program: https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Global HIGH Security Risk ^Shadown^ (Feb 03)
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk yossarian (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk yossarian (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk yossarian (Feb 03)
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk Jonathan Rickman (Feb 03)
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk Benjamin Keller (Feb 03)
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk Michael Renzmann (Feb 04)
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk Benjamin Keller (Feb 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Global HIGH Security Risk bugtraq (Feb 03)
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk David Howe (Feb 04)
- Global HIGH Security Risk phenethyl (Feb 03)
- re: Global HIGH Security Risk ^Shadown^ (Feb 03)
- Re: re: Global HIGH Security Risk David Howe (Feb 04)
- Re: re: Global HIGH Security Risk Jonathan Rickman (Feb 04)
- RE: Global HIGH Security Risk John . Airey (Feb 04)
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk ^Shadown^ (Feb 06)
- RE: Global HIGH Security Risk Lance Fitz-Herbert (Feb 04)
- RE: Global HIGH Security Risk Jeroen Doorn (Feb 04)
- RE: Global HIGH Security Risk Jonathan Rickman (Feb 04)
- RE: Global HIGH Security Risk Melvyn Sopacua (Feb 04)
- Re: Global HIGH Security Risk Peter (Feb 04)
- RE: Global HIGH Security Risk Jonathan Rickman (Feb 04)