Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Unusual request


From: aeonflux <aeonflux () aeonflux no-ip com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 01:00:40 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 12 February 2003 8:49 pm, yossarian wrote:
Well, ahm, I said considered illegal by some people, I was referring to the
lines in the Cybercrime Treaty on disclosing information that CAN be used
for illegal activities. That is why I just gave an URL - allthough I
believe Paul to be an honest person, I cannot verify if his intentions are
100% legal, nor that he sent the e-mail, nor that he is the only person
reading the mail. The treaty does not go into forums or mailinglists. The
information passed on this forum might well be used for any / some of the
offences covered by the treaty. IF any info on this forum is linked to a
specific case in court, ALL subscribers of course will be suspects. Now
that TIA is on hold, how are they ever gonna catch the bad guys posing as
security specialists? And how am I to know everybody reading this list, or
any of the one-line archives, is not a criminal?
Regardless, everyone and there dog knows about the unicode directory traversal 
exploit.  It was actually demostrated live on "the screen savers" on techtv.  
I think you're safe handing out this information.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+SyZ41mDajpZ9rHwRAp0vAJ0edNT6XRgZMyUw+xx5Myp0cCl8EQCgtQ2x
Qwwgw9wvc+SdkZklPyLlkQQ=
=BGK1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: