Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:14:53 -0700
Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
I just curious how you geniuses would solve this problem. You have a multi-six figure scientific instrument, which is only manufactured by one vendor in the entire world. Your research department depends upon that instrument to do research for which they are being funded handsomely by grants and expected to produce results. There's only one problem. The instrument requires that you run Windows 2000 Server with IIS, and the vendor requires that you not apply *any* patches post SP2. The government certifies the equipment at a certain patch level, and if the equipment is patched then the certification no longer applies, the research is no longer funded and you are now staring a six figure boat anchor.
<snip>
2) Minus points if you say "Don't allow access to the Internet. It *requires* access to the Internet. (IOW, it has to be able to connect to "live" IP address ranges, not private IPs.)
What *kind* of Internet access? Any reason I can't put a firewall or proxy of some sort between it and the Internet? Maybe an IDS running as a router?
BB _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Schmehl, Paul L (Aug 14)
- Re: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Blue Boar (Aug 15)
- Re: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Barry Irwin (Aug 15)
- RE: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Steve Wray (Aug 15)
- RE: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Tobias Oetiker (Aug 15)
- RE: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Jason Coombs (Aug 15)
- Re: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Barry Irwin (Aug 15)
- Re: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Michael Renzmann (Aug 15)
- Re: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 vb (Aug 15)
- RE: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Jeroen Massar (Aug 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Schmehl, Paul L (Aug 15)
- Re: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 David Hane (Aug 15)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1 Blue Boar (Aug 15)