Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038?
From: "Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats)" <mstahlkrantz () lucent com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:55:19 -0400
Never mind. Different issue causing this. -----Original Message----- From: Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats) [mailto:mstahlkrantz () lucent com] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:48 PM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: [Full-disclosure] New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? We're starting to see exploit attempts that are followed by probes from the infected host on tcp/4444, and then UDP/1038. Has anyone else seen this?
Current thread:
- New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats) (Aug 14)
- Re: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? Jeremiah Cornelius (Aug 14)
- Re: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? Jeremiah Cornelius (Aug 14)
- Re: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? w g (Aug 14)
- Re: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? Nick FitzGerald (Aug 14)
- Re: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? w g (Aug 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats) (Aug 14)
- Re: New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038? Donnie Weiner (Aug 14)