Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: RPC DCOM Patches
From: Byron Copeland <nodialtone () comcast net>
Date: 01 Aug 2003 15:11:22 -0400
Has anyone proved that NT 4.0 is vulnerable? I keep seeing references everywhere that it is... who has the proof? -b On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:02, Tinsley Paul wrote:
NT4 Workstation is vulnerable but is no longer supported, unless you have an extended support contract with Microsoft. Your only real options are to turn off DCOM and/or put a personal firewall on the box. -----Original Message----- From: John Sec [mailto:john_sec_lists () hotmail com] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 7:32 AM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: [Full-disclosure] RPC DCOM Patches The MS website says that the patch can only be applied to Windows 2000 systems with SP3 or SP4. Has anybody tried to run the patch on an SP2 system? Are NT 4 Workstations vulnerable too, or just NT 4 Servers? Thanks _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: RPC DCOM Patches Jasper Blackwell (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RPC DCOM Patches Albert Saerong (Aug 01)
- RE: RPC DCOM Patches John . Airey (Aug 01)
- RE: RPC DCOM Patches Byron Copeland (Aug 01)
- Re: RPC DCOM Patches devnull (Aug 05)