Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect


From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs () tcoip com br>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:01:31 -0300

Not to mention that blaming a person for not being bullet proof when the murderer pulls the trigger is, well, stupid. Anyone thinking that way is in serious denial or in need of a reality check.

Ben Nelson wrote:
You need to keep in mind that affected != infected.  Many of us admins who
don't even administrate a single windows box were affected by amount of
bandwidth consumed by people who were infected.  This thing effectively
created a denial of service on many networks and any host trying to use
that network (be it an infected windows box or one of my hundreds of unix
boxes) was, at the very least, significantly slowed down.

--Ben

On August 29, 10:18 am "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com> wrote:

if the worm was active in anticipation of a patch that intoduced a new
exploit vector and it took advantage of that, is'nt the vendor (
microsoft ) to blame then? As well there was plenty of advanced warning
on this exploit long before msblast was an issue. It seems to me that it
is each admins responsiblity, if they were affected ( infected ) not the
coder. if this were the case the LastStage(of)Delerium would be the
blamed party for developing and releasing the exploit, but alas.. they
are not of USA orgin. SUE LITIGATE BLAME PROCECUTE

as long as the general public remains uneducated ( and many Fortune500
admins) we will continue
to see this type of action against coders for blame, not the people
actualy responsible for allowing
thier infrastructure to become targets in the first place. im sure this
ignorance is a byproduct of
the weak mind of most Americans as they are in a constant state to blame
other for thier own
problems, this can be seen everywhere in todays American society...
commonly refered as to the "poor me" syndrome..
Q. why did you murder the victim?
A. my father never told me he loved me
( real answer - you pulled the triger )

Q. why was my network compromised?
A. because of someone else
( real answer - you suck at internet )


muh 2 bytes,
morning_wood

----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Ballowe" <hangman-fulldisclosure () steelballs org>
To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Authorities eye MSBlaster suspect



On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:14:51PM -0000, 00005702 () no-id com wrote:

And this kid is dumb enough be be living in the U.S.A. man, when are
people going to learn, next we will here that he has been charged
with every penny the worm caused and will be sentence under the new
and ever improving Terrorist act.


Interesting -- the net cost of the worm is actually a net $0.00. For
every penny that a company chalks up as a cost to the worm, some
other company must be chalking up the cost as a profit from the worm.

-Charlie

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


--
Daniel C. Sobral                   (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo () tco net br
        Daniel.Sobral () tcoip com br
        dcs () tcoip com br

Outros:
        dcs () newsguy com
        dcs () freebsd org
        capo () notorious bsdconspiracy net

The universe is laughing behind your back.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: