RE: Interscan - path disclosure - WAS:SpamAssasin - path disclosure

["Joshua Vince" <joshv () bcgsys com>]

What would you consider the "proper tool for the job"?

-----Original Message-----
From: morning_wood [mailto:se_cur_ity () hotmail com] 
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:17 PM
To: ViLLaN; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Interscan - path disclosure - WAS:SpamAssasin
- path disclosure


ahhh, ok you are the first to specifically state " section of the header
showing the path ".
 
thank you for the clarity. 
 
Trend Interscan Viruswall has a path disclosure issue
 
 
 
So these products are often used in conjuntion with each other?
Trend Interscan Viruswall and Spamassasin run on the same box and
combining thier output?
 
 i think im going to turbocharge, supercharge and nitrous my lawnmowers
<http://www.briggsandstratton.com/> Briggs & Stratton.
im sure i will cut more grass more better by stacking products and
solutions together instead
of purchasing the proper tool for the job.
 
morning_wood
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
 

From: ViLLaN <mailto:villain () protonic com>  
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com 
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure


No one is denying that Spamassasin is in use, they are saying that the
section of the header showing the path (what your original post was
about from what I understood), is Interscan, not Spamassasin..