Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Re: [issa-international] Re: Confidentiality statement on email


From: yossarian <yossarian () planet nl>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:38:25 +0200

It depends on the country you are operating in, so you can't rely on it too
much. Dutch jurisprudence says an e-mail has the same status as a postcard -
you cannot blame the postman if he reads it. Especially since there are
plenty of technical means available to secure it.

Anyway, why didn't you sue the other party for illegal possession of your
e-mail? How did they get it? If you have a policystatement, include that
forwarding is not allowed, then there is money in it. Somewhere.

yossarian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernie, CTA" <cta () hcsin net>
To: "Ken Burns" <KCB () KCBurns com>; <issa-international () yahoogroups com>
Cc: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: [issa-international] Re: Confidentiality
statement on email


On 15 Apr 2003, at 20:41, Ken Burns wrote:

What is the point in using these confidentiality statements?

My issues with them are that they are regularly posted to mail
lists like this one, and are often posted on the emails that
advise you pass this on to at least X# aditional people or you
will have interminable bad luck.  The point bieing that they are
regularly disseminated on emails that are intended for public
distribution.

They are also regularly found on other joke & junk emails that
have nothing to do with any corporate business.

Additionally, they are placed at the bottom of the message, where
they are least likely to get read.  Honestly folks, when was the
last time you read one of these on an e-mail you received?

Has anybody  ever seen one of these confidentiality statements
make one iota of difference (other than to jusify a lawyers
existence [and billability] for the day he/she composed it)?

I would seriously like to know if they have any redeeming value.


bhh>>>
I can tell you first hand that a privacy statement on the bottom
of an email has significance from a legal evidence standpoint.
My former company and I were involved in a US civil lawsuit
where the opposing side attempted to introduce an email as
evidence.  This email had our standard privacy/confidentially
disclosure at the end and was sent from me to another party
who was not connected with the lawsuit. Our attorney objected
to the use of the email arguing that it was a private and possibly
privileged communication, and that release of its contents could
violate the privacy rights of the receiving party.

By the way, there was also a discussion as to the authenticity
and validity of the privacy / confidentiality statement. The court
wanted to know if our company had mandated the use of such
statements in its policies for private communications, if it was
recommended and reviewed by our attorneys, and if we used
the Privacy Statement on all email. The answer was yes to the
first two questions, and no to the last, as we only used the
Privacy Statement on email that we believed to be private and
confidential. Apparently, these questions were directed to
establish the bases for good faith effort by our company to
establish, implement and maintain a privacy policy and
mechanism that we believed protected the content of any email
sent with such a privacy statement.

The opposing side rebutted claiming that the email was sent via
the Internet (a public network), and therefore it and its contents
were not private. The court disagreed stating that while the
communications medium was public the contents of the email
were not, as the sender intended it to be released only to the
named recipient.

Since the recipient was not a party to the lawsuit and did not
release/wave its privacy rights the Judge ruled that the email's
contents including its subject were intended to be private, to a
disinterested party and therefore inadmissible.

My sage advice is:

a) Establish a written Privacy Policy identifying the use of email
privacy statements,

b) Prepare an Email Privacy Statement and have an attorney
review and provide a letter of recommendation for its use.

c) Implement the Privacy Statement and practices to include it
on all email that you consider private and or confidential
between you and the recipient(s).

bhh<<<
-



-
****************************************************
Bernie
Chief Technology Architect
Chief Security Officer
cta () hcsin net
Euclidean Systems, Inc.
*******************************************************
// "There is no expedient to which a man will not go
//    to avoid the pure labor of honest thinking."
//     Honest thought, the real business capital.
//      Observe> Think> Plan> Think> Do> Think>
*******************************************************

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: