Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: UN support for "security by obscurity"
From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:28:11 -0600
-----Original Message----- From: Rick Updegrove [mailto:security () updegrove net] Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 12:11 PM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] UN support for "security by obscurity" The slapper worm variants don't go to netcraft and ask "what's that site running" before they use root you. May I use this as my sig? :-) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: UN support for "security by obscurity", (continued)
- Re: UN support for "security by obscurity" Brian Hatch (Dec 06)
- Re: UN support for "security by obscurity" Rick Updegrove (Dec 07)
- *Including* Security through obscurity measures is good. Brian Hatch (Dec 08)
- Re: UN support for "security by obscurity" Rick Updegrove (Dec 07)
- Re: UN support for "security by obscurity" Georgi Guninski (Dec 07)
- Re: UN support for "security by obscurity" Michal Zalewski (Dec 07)
- Re: UN support for "security by obscurity" Brian McWilliams (Dec 07)
- "security by obscurity" Berend-Jan Wever (Dec 07)
- Re: "security by obscurity" Niels Bakker (Dec 08)
- Re: "security by obscurity" Georgi Guninski (Dec 09)
- Re: "security by obscurity" Roland Postle (Dec 09)
- "security by obscurity" Berend-Jan Wever (Dec 07)
- Re: UN support for "security by obscurity" Brian Hatch (Dec 06)
- RE: UN support for "security by obscurity" Schmehl, Paul L (Dec 07)