Full Disclosure mailing list archives
(no subject)
From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Timothy J.Miller)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:22:23 -0500
On Friday, August 16, 2002, at 01:42 PM, Matthew Murphy wrote:
So vendors are giving people a false sense of security -- but, isn't thepurpose of this list (at least in part) to expose such things (by presenting timely information, etc.)? In that case, what purpose would attacking the list serve?
I never said I condoned their activity, just that I understand their motivations and in some limited way sympathize with them. In their own view (or, more accurately, in their view as it seems to *me*), attacking the list disrupts the flow of information from the legitimate community into the hands of what they see as an illegitimate community-- the semi-skilled security "experts." -- Cerebus
Current thread:
- (no subject) full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Aug 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- (no subject) Democow (Aug 15)
- (no subject) Democow (Aug 15)
- (no subject) T34cup (Aug 16)
- (no subject) Matthew Murphy (Aug 16)
- (no subject) Timothy J.Miller (Aug 16)
- (no subject) Matthew Murphy (Aug 16)
- (no subject) Timothy J.Miller (Aug 16)
- (no subject) Matthew Murphy (Aug 16)
- =;-> full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Aug 16)
- Yes? Peter van den Heuvel (Aug 17)
- (no subject) Timothy J.Miller (Aug 16)
- (no subject) Matthew Murphy (Aug 17)
- (no subject) Matthew Murphy (Aug 18)