IDS mailing list archives
RE: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ...
From: kgeorgiades () toplayer com
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:15:56 -0500
Thierry, The best way to do this is using an IDS Balancer. (possibly the only way to do it right) The IDS Balancer will: a) Aggregate the traffic b) Filter the traffic (if you want to do that, so that you can send different traffic to different sensors) c) Create multiple copies (e.g. same traffic to 2 different sensors) d) Load balance the traffic to groups of sensors. The pricing of the Top Layer IDS Balancer is very close to the prices of taps. The ROI of the IDS Balancer is so compelling that most of out customers admit that the savings pay for the IDS Balancer from day one. The Top Layer IDS Balancer is a family of products from entry level fast Ethernet configurations to multi-GigE. http://www.toplayer.com/content/products/intrusion_detection/ids_balancer.js p Note: I work for Top Layer. Kyriacos (Ken) Georgiades Senior Director, Product Line Management Top Layer Networks, Inc Tel: 508 870 1300 x 231 Cell: 508 783 5988 Fax: 508 870 9797 Email: kgeorgiades () toplayer com www.toplayer.com -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Bôle [mailto:tbole () telsys ch] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 8:00 AM To: focus-ids () securityfocus com Subject: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Hello, Has anyone tested taps supporting traffic aggregation (with the capability to mirror the traffic only on one link) I know that we can have some bandwidth limitations: if the 2 network ports are operating at 100mbps and the IDS port is operating at 100mbps as well, then under sustained aggregate bandwidth of greater than 100mbps, packets will get dropped. Thank you for your feedback. Thierry --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Thierry Bôle (Jan 27)
- Re: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Andy Cuff (Jan 27)
- RE: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Steve Bernard (Jan 27)
- Re: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Matthew Jonkman (Jan 27)
- RE: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Chris Ralph (Jan 28)
- Re: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Matthew Jonkman (Jan 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... William_Boyle (Jan 27)
- RE: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Steve Bernard (Jan 29)
- RE: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Josh.Berry (Jan 28)
- RE: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... kgeorgiades (Jan 28)
- Re: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Andy Cuff (Jan 29)
- Re: Taps supporting traffic aggregation ... Thierry Bôle (Jan 29)