IDS mailing list archives

RE: Intruvert 4000.


From: "Bob Walder" <bwalder () spamcop net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:14:18 +0100

Great to hear about real-world deployments of these devices - take a
look at our new IPS report (www.nss.co.uk/ips) for our take on the
I-4000 and other in-line IPS devices.

Regards,

Bob Walder
Director
The NSS Group

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain
information that may be of a privileged or confidential nature. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender and
destroy the message immediately. Unauthorised use or reproduction of
this message is strictly prohibited.



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Paine [mailto:steve () hiblue com] 
Sent: 27 January 2004 10:17
To: focus-ids () securityfocus com
Subject: Intruvert 4000.


By way of an introduction, and using the 'give before you 
get' principle, i 
thought i'd drop a few lines about our recent purchase of 
the Intruvert 4000 
from Network associates.

We chose the intruvert 4000 over a number of other devices 
due to its ability 
to handle assymetric traffic in a load-balancing scanario. 
We have 2 x 1GB 
connections going through this device.

We've had it for three weeks now and have been, lets say, 'playing.'

Things i like: 
Ease of setup. The device must be operated via a seperate 
management machine 
and after this has been installed, the device can be put 
into action as an 
IDS device very quickly with the standard profiles.
As an active device, things are obviously more tricky. DDOS 
protection and 
learning profiles caused us some problems for a while as it was very 
difficult to see what the device had learnt and what it was 
blocking. As we 
go furher with testing, this part of the device is becoming 
clearer. We havent done any throughput or delay tests and I 
guess, we won't do much in 
this area. Our traffic loads aren't that high that we need 
to worry about 
device overloading at this stage.

Thing i dont like:
The management interface is s-l-o-w. Despite having a P4 2.4 
running with 1GB 
memory, the java-based management application is too fat for 
its job. It  
needs a lot of optimisation. Mouse clicks are taking three 
seconds to respond 
which is a real pain when you have to go through 4 mouse 
clicks to get where 
you want to go. 

Things I want to know more about:
Writing signatures and sharing signatures. I will also need 
to find out if I 
can use some standard format for localy written signatures.  (Snort 
standard?)

Anyway, things are looking good right now. We deploy in a 
coupe of months so I 
guess i'll have a few more things to say before then.

If anyone else is using Intruvert at all, let me know. 

Regards

Steve


-------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
--------------





---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: