Re: IPv6 support in firewalls

["Behm, Jeffrey L." <BehmJL () bv com>]

On Monday, August 27, 2007 2:31 AM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: 

Snipped out the discussion about why IPv6 should be deployed to 
every device, even those "inside the firewall" and that NAT should
be killed...

> First you should not rely on NAT as a security measure, anyway,
> because it isn't.

For a security-conscious IT professional, this may be a true statement.

But, for the vast majority of end users of IT, given the choice of a 
Hardware NAT device vs. nothing for security, I'll pick the hardware
NAT device every time.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards