Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Appropriate PIX logging level
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:59:31 +0400
Сhecked out if there are any news on sdsc syslog, nothing for last 3 years :-( On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 04:42:51PM -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
Well, it could be worse! It could use BEEP. ;) But, yes, I agree, syslog-ng is very "feature rich"
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 02)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level David Lang (May 02)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 02)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level David Lang (May 02)
- minirsyslogd (was Appropriate PIX logging level) Bennett Todd (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level ArkanoiD (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level ArkanoiD (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 04)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Brian Loe (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Marcus J. Ranum (May 02)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Chuck Swiger (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level ArkanoiD (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Chuck Swiger (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level ArkanoiD (May 05)
- Re: Appropriate PIX logging level David Lang (May 02)
- RE: Appropriate PIX logging level David Lang (May 04)