Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: fun problem - possibly not possible
From: "Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:28:24 -0600
On 3/24/06, Paul Melson <pmelson () gmail com> wrote:
-----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] fun problem - possibly not possible What protocol(s) are you using Network Dispatcher for? I'm not sure I understand why 1) Network Dispatcher has to reference the other servers by their public addresses and not their DMZ addresses and 2) why you've got the firewall doing NAT for the servers you're trying to load balance with Network Dispatcher.
The reason I have to do it that way is because I'm not an AIX administrator and those that are say this is how it has to be - and I guess they're not real motivated to investigate other methods. This will be a serious issue for them in the near future, however, since if we stay with the AIX software solution (as opposed to a BigIP or CSS appliance) they're going to have to figure out how to do it "right" - so we can start NATing everything. If you know the software, can you point me in the direction of documentation on how to set this type of thing up? I've querried the IBM site some and come up empty (though considering their attitudes, I didn't bother getting too involved in it).
If you were doing this with almost anything other than a PIX, this would probably work the way you have it configured. But since a PIX won't route or NAT across the same interface, it doesn't work. That said, I don't think you need it configured that way in order for this to work.
Agreed, but thats a plus, right? I mean, other devices are just adding automatically what I'm missing here, right? I'm sure there's still a way to do it with a PIX - the alias command and a route perhaps? _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- fun problem - possibly not possible Brian Loe (Mar 22)
- RE: fun problem - possibly not possible Paul Melson (Mar 26)
- Re: fun problem - possibly not possible Brian Loe (Mar 26)
- RE: fun problem - possibly not possible Paul Melson (Mar 26)
- Re: fun problem - possibly not possible Brian Loe (Mar 26)
- Re: fun problem - possibly not possible Brian Loe (Mar 26)
- RE: fun problem - possibly not possible Paul Melson (Mar 26)