Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr () ranum com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:57:28 -0500
ArkanoiD wrote:
Allowing uncotrolled HTTP CONNECT to any port seems quite suicidal for any reasonable security policy, am i wrong?
Most organizations have already given up control over outgoing traffic. What they don't realize is that, by extension, they have also given up control over incoming traffic. mjr. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: In defense of non standard ports Behm, Jeffrey L. (Jan 23)
- RE: RE: In defense of non standard ports Bill Royds (Jan 23)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Tobias Reckhard (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports James (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports ArkanoiD (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Chuck Swiger (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Paul D. Robertson (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Tim Shea (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Paul D. Robertson (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- RE: In defense of non standard ports Brian Loe (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports ArkanoiD (Jan 25)
- RE: RE: In defense of non standard ports Bill Royds (Jan 23)
- RE: RE: In defense of non standard ports Bill Royds (Jan 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RE: In defense of non standard ports Fetch, Brandon (Jan 23)
- RE: RE: In defense of non standard ports Behm, Jeffrey L. (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Karl (Jan 24)