Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: IPS vs. Firewalls
From: Mark Teicher <mht3 () earthlink net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:51:38 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Phil Albacore wrote:They've heard that IPS sensors can be used to block traffic, so they've got it in their heads that we don't need a firewall anymore.
I would suggest http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/papers/a1-firewall/index.html if you would like to save money in your IT Network Security Budget on IPS/IDS Budget line item and Firewall Budget line item. -----Original Message-----
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr () ranum com> Sent: Feb 2, 2006 12:33 PM To: Phil Albacore <phila () msgsPostini01 kvh co jp>, firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] IPS vs. Firewalls Phil Albacore wrote:They've heard that IPS sensors can be used to block traffic, so they've got it in their heads that we don't need a firewall anymore.I'd suggest you have them ask a few of the IPS vendors if they recommend using their product in that manner. Unless you're talking to the IPS vendors that are basically selling a firewall+signatures (like a "deep packet inspection" firewall) they will backpedal away from that very rapidly. Perhaps your path of least resistance is to tell them that you want one of the new generation "IPS firewalls" then you can turn off the IPS crap (which won't do anything except slow the firewall down, anyhow) and use the firewall rules. The only problem with that is that most of the IPS firewalls are little more than a cheesy "stateful" packet filter with a few dozen signatures hammered into the packet forwarder loop. I'd be being uncharacteristically generous if I said that they "suck" - they're not nearly that good. I've got to thank you for asking the question; it made me look at a few of the IPS vendor claims to see if many of them have the guts to say they replace a firewall. I particularly got a chuckle out of Intruvert's (now NAI) claim that they protect against encrypted attacks. I needed some yuks to lighten up my morning!! I quote: " McAfee IntruShield delivers comprehensive protection against todays constantly evolving threats, including known, zero-day, and encrypted attacks." Wow -- that does sound pretty good. I guess you don't need a firewall after all!! mjr. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?), (continued)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Dave Piscitello (Feb 07)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 07)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Dave Piscitello (Feb 07)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 07)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Dave Piscitello (Feb 07)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Richard Stiennon (Feb 08)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Gabriele Buratti (Feb 08)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Chris Byrd (Feb 08)
- RE: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Ben Nagy (Feb 07)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?) Gabriele Buratti (Feb 08)
- Re: IPS vs. Firewalls Julian M D (Feb 03)