Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: the infamous "static" versus "nat"
From: "Bruce Smith" <bruce_the_loon () worldonline co za>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 15:25:15 +0200
Hi The single biggest difference I've found between doing using static and nat is that nat allocates the translation from the bottom of the subnet up, while a static across a subnet maps directly. NAT - 10.1.1.0 -> 10.1.1.0 (in order of access) 10.1.1.1 -> 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.23 -> 10.1.1.2 10.1.1.109 -> 10.1.1.1.3 10.1.1.2 -> 10.1.1.4 Static 10.1.1.0 -> 10.1.1.0 (in order of access) 10.1.1.1 -> 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.23 -> 10.1.1.23 10.1.1.109 -> 10.1.1.1.109 10.1.1.2 -> 10.1.1.2 Beyond that, we tend to use statics from outside to dmz/inside and where we need a direct IP to IP for DNS/WINS based back-connects. Otherwise we use NAT as it is easier to maintain. Regards, Bruce Smith -----Original Message----- From: firewall-wizards-admin () honor icsalabs com [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin () honor icsalabs com] On Behalf Of Vahid Pazirandeh Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 8:02 PM To: firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com Subject: [fw-wiz] the infamous "static" versus "nat" Hi All. Great mail list btw, thanks to everyones input. Two basic questions. 1. I've heard the convention of using "static" for low-to-high NATing and "nat/global" for high-to-low. Why? 2. Would someone explain the underlying differences in these two commands? Do they achieve the same thing? Assume net1 = 10.1.1.0/24, net2 = 10.2.2.0/24. A. static (net1, net2) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 B. static (net2, net1) 10.2.2.0 10.2.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 Cheers! ============================================= "Make it better before you make it faster." ============================================= __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- the infamous "static" versus "nat" Vahid Pazirandeh (Apr 07)
- Re: the infamous "static" versus "nat" Avishai Wool (Apr 09)
- RE: the infamous "static" versus "nat" Bruce Smith (Apr 09)