Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem
From: hermit921 <hermit921 () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:13:39 -0700
At 10:56 AM 7/6/2005, Paul Robertson wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Devdas Bhagat wrote: > Ugh. Mailscanner is known to be unsafe with Postfix and can cause mail > loss. Use amavisd-new instead. That was a while back- the Mailscanner folks have changed to implement things in the way Wieste suggested, and it now uses a hold queue to do processing. Unless i've missed something in the meantime, it looks to be fully functional with Postfix now. Paul D. Robertson
We have been using MailScanner for nearly 2 years, with no problems. We read the docs online, but decided a single postfix instance with a hold queue made more sense. Now they recommend our approach.
hermit921
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem David M. Nicksic (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Paul D. Robertson (Jul 06)
- RE: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem David M. Nicksic (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Devdas Bhagat (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Paul Robertson (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem hermit921 (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Devdas Bhagat (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Paul D. Robertson (Jul 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Gregory Hicks (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Devdas Bhagat (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Paul D. Robertson (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Devdas Bhagat (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Paul D. Robertson (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco PIX Version 6.3(3) SMTP Problem Devdas Bhagat (Jul 06)