Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs?
From: David Lang <david.lang () digitalinsight com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Matt Bazan wrote:Is there a preferred method of setting up a Internet facing screened subnet and the use of public or private IP addresses? Looking at redesinging our DMZ to only include public resources (www, smtp, imap, ftp). Presently we use a private IP address range for this that is NAT'ed at our firewall. Any reasons to change this policy to using public IPs in the DMZ? Thanks,If you're NATing to your internal network, then a rework is necessary- public stuff should be on its own (preferably) physical subnet. IP addressing doesn't matter much, since you'll be letting stuff through the most likely exploit vectors anyway.
The thing I've been eharing for years about why NAT is better is that you may change ISP's and end up with a new set of IP addresses which are easier to change if you NAT.
this may be true (I've actually never seen anyone acutally DO this), but you are trading one-time headaches (which I personally believe are no more severe then all the other changes that you need to make when changing things, firewalls, DNS, NAT tables, etc) for ongoing overhead (performance on your NAT device, troubleshooting, bugs in the NAT implementation, overloading of the NAT tables, etc)
I would definantly have things that server the Internet use public addresses, once you get behind that layer and have devices that only talk to internal stuff, then make it all private addresses.
David Lang -- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C.A.R. Hoare _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Internet accessible screened subnet - use public or private IPs? Matt Bazan (Jul 21)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public or private IPs? Paul D. Robertson (Jul 21)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs? David Lang (Jul 21)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs? Dave Piscitello (Jul 22)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs? David Lang (Jul 22)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs? Victor Williams (Jul 25)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs? David Lang (Jul 25)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs? Victor Williams (Jul 25)
- RE: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs? lordchariot (Jul 25)
- RE: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs? Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 26)
- RE: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs? R. DuFresne (Jul 27)
- RE: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs? Luis Bruno (Jul 30)
- RE: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivateIPs? Paul D. Robertson (Jul 30)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs? David Lang (Jul 21)
- Re: Internet accessible screened subnet - use public or private IPs? Paul D. Robertson (Jul 21)