Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
i-cap proposals
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:32:59 +0300
Shame on me, though i joined i-cap mailing list quite early looking for universal content inspection protocol, i found it too http-bound for general use and seeing no live code for a long period of time somehow lost interest. I underestimated the project's future and thus made no contributions. It is late now, but there are some major design problems: 1) response content entities icap deals with defining inspection policy are.. surprise, "filenames with given extensions". (Transfer-* headers) Wait, there is no such thing when we are not dealing with local storage! There are content types! And those may be multipart of various types (real pain for inspection proxies to deal) and so on. 2) It is still HTTP-bound. There should be recommendations on how to deal with SMTP, POP3, IMAP, FTP and other - we should standardize how those requests are being presented to ICAP. Any ideas what to do now? ;-) _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 11)
- RE: i-cap proposals lordchariot (Feb 12)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 14)
- Re: i-cap proposals Carson Gaspar (Feb 19)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 19)
- Re: i-cap proposals Paul D. Robertson (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals Paul D. Robertson (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals Paul D. Robertson (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 14)
- RE: i-cap proposals lordchariot (Feb 12)