Re: Certification (was Re:Vulnerability Response)

[Vladimir Parkhaev <vladimir () arobas net>]

Quoting Dave Piscitello (yodave () hargray com):
> > I strongly disagree. $consultant != 'expert'. Most of the consultants
> > out there have great PR and soft skills and limited technical skills.
> > There are soooo many clueless consultants out there, way more than
> > cluefull ones...
>
> I hope the moderator will put this thread to bed, as it's degenerating
> into digital racism. Once we begin blanket condemnation of any group
> we aren't acting much like wizards...

Well, sorry Dave (and other cluefull consultants out there). I meant to
say that 'consultant' does not automaticaly imply 'expert'. It is kind
of tricky to express it in perl...

It was totaly wrong of me to say 
$consultant != 'expert'; 
Since it produces
Argument "expert" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at line whatever.

None of the following describe the meaning correctly:
$consultant ne 'expert';
$consultant !~ /expert/;
perhaps the best is
($consultant && $cluefull)?  'expert' : undef;
but $cluefull is also seems to be undefined....

;)



-- 
.signature: No such file or directory
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards