Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: iso 17799
From: Bennett Todd <bet () rahul net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:04:32 +0000
2004-07-13T14:48:27 avraham shir-el (arthur sherman):
i've seen lots on this list about best practices w/o any refrences to 17799.
"Best Practices". Anytime you hear someone using the phrase in the context of computer security, if they're not condemning the phrase itself, you should put your hand on your wallet to make sure they've not already lifted it, and leave immediately. "Best practices" is a phrase that carries some strong connations of respectibility; the professionals who design and document best practices in financial management and reporting have a lot of credibility. Maybe when computer science is as mature as finance, in a couple of thousand years or so, best practices will be a meaningful and valuable concept here as well. At the moment, though, sales weasles use it to try to paint a lustre of respectibility on whatever they're trying to sell at the moment. -Bennett
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- iso 17799 avraham shir-el (arthur sherman) (Jul 15)
- Re: iso 17799 Rachel Rosencrantz (Jul 19)
- RE: iso 17799 Wes Noonan (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Bennett Todd (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Chuck Swiger (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Devdas Bhagat (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 George Capehart (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Chuck Swiger (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Paul D. Robertson (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 George Capehart (Jul 20)
- Re: iso 17799 Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Christine Kronberg (Jul 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: iso 17799 J. Oquendo (Jul 19)
- Re: iso 17799 Bennett Todd (Jul 19)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: iso 17799 Rachel Rosencrantz (Jul 19)