Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Changes in How ARP is Handled between PIX OS 5.x and OS6.3?
From: "Harry Whitehouse" <harry () endicia com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:36:01 -0800
Hello All! I'm trying to upgrade my PIX firewall and ran into a problem with a Windows Load Balanced Array (WLBS). In my PIX 5.x operating system (which I set up 2 years ago), it seemed to require that I have an APR statement like this: arp inside 192.168.100.246 03bf.C0A8.6416 alias This production box has worked flawlessly for 2+ years. I have a conduit bridging an outside public address to this internal IP address and running https traffic. When I tried to replace my 5.x PIX box with a new PIX running OS 6.3, the load balancing stopped working completely. I set up a separate test bed with the new PIX and a test Load Balanced array and it seems that WLBS will work WITHOUT the ARP statement, but will not work with the ARP statement. Does anyone know of changes between the PIX OS versions which would explain this behavior? TIA Harry _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Changes in How ARP is Handled between PIX OS 5.x and OS6.3? Harry Whitehouse (Feb 04)
- Re: Changes in How ARP is Handled between PIX OS 5.x and OS6.3? Dario Calia (Feb 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Changes in How ARP is Handled between PIX OS 5.x and OS6.3? Mike McNutt (Feb 10)
- RE: Changes in How ARP is Handled between PIX OS 5.x and OS6.3? Harry Whitehouse (Feb 10)