Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd)
From: daw () mozart cs berkeley edu (David Wagner)
Date: 18 Oct 2002 20:07:55 GMT
Mike Frantzen wrote:
The problem with a hashed state table is that hash tables are very easy to attack.
This is only true if you use an unkeyed hash function. If you use a keyed hash function, with the key chosen randomly on boot and kept secret, this is no longer true. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd), (continued)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Paul Robertson (Oct 16)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Carson Gaspar (Oct 17)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Mikael Olsson (Oct 16)
- RE: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Schouten, Diederik (Diederik) (Oct 17)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Stephen Gill (Oct 17)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Carson Gaspar (Oct 17)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Mike Frantzen (Oct 17)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Miles Sabin (Oct 18)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Darren Reed (Oct 22)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Mike Frantzen (Oct 22)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Carson Gaspar (Oct 17)
- Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) David Wagner (Oct 18)
- RE: Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Ben Nagy (Oct 19)
- RE: Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Bill Royds (Oct 19)
- RE: Re: CERT vulnerability note VU# 539363 (fwd) Ben Nagy (Oct 19)