Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Cisco 2621 opinions
From: Patrick Darden <darden () armc org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 13:55:32 -0400 (EDT)
When I said extensive CBAC lists, I meant lots of ACLs, not use of extended or reflexive types. I simply meant that the more ACLs you apply, the slower your performance would get.... E.g. 5 rule list vs a 500 rule list. I certainly don't disagree with anything you say here, but I don't think you disagree with anything I actually said either. BTW, the ios qos features work best with slower lines like BRIs. I would never use them for fast/ethernet.... -- --Patrick Darden Internetworking Manager -- 706.475.3312 darden () armc org -- Athens Regional Medical Center On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Brian Ford wrote:
Patrick, I would disagree with your assessment of an "extensive rule set". The IOS Firewall is completely Stateful for TCP; builds state for UDP connections; offers all the IOS ACLs (Standard, Extended, Reflexive, Dynamic and Time of Day); as well as ICMP filtering. You have extensive IOS Syslog capabilities. You have access to all the IOS QOS mechanisms. If you are reasonable in your use of the state mechanisms you can usually achieve (at least a little) better performance. So you balance the use of traditional ACLs and IP audit capability. I've found that 3 Mbps throughput is usually fine considering that's using a router between a T-1 line and an Ethernet network. No? If you had multiple serial connections coming in or if this were an Ethernet to Ethernet connection you could look at the 2651 or the 3600s. Liberty for All, Brian At 12:00 PM 7/16/2002 -0400, you wrote:Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:12:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick Darden <darden () armc org> To: firewall-wizards () nfr net Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco 2621 opinions Joe, The 2621 series can handle, in fast-switching mode, 25kpps. If simple packet filtering is in place, half that. If you are using IPFW IOS then half that. If you are using extensive rule sets, then half that. Let's say you get about 6kpps. A standard packet is 64 bytes, so 6000X64==384KBps. This is equivalent to 3mbps. Not even ethernet speed. And this is without an extensive rule set. Even with no filtering, max routing in fast-switching mode is about 12mbps. With CBAC and extensive lists, this could go down to 1.5mpbs. ymmv. -- --Patrick Darden Internetworking Manager -- 706.475.3312 darden () armc org -- Athens Regional Medical Center
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions, (continued)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Nick Drage (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Charles W. Swiger (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Patrick M. Hausen (Jul 16)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Nick Drage (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Patrick Darden (Jul 15)
- RE: Cisco 2621 opinions Henry Sieff (Jul 13)
- RE: Cisco 2621 opinions Kent, Ashley (Jul 15)
- RE: Cisco 2621 opinions Brian Ford (Jul 15)
- RE: Cisco 2621 opinions Iannaccone, Al (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Patrick Darden (Jul 15)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Brian Ford (Jul 16)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Patrick Darden (Jul 16)
- Re: Cisco 2621 opinions Carson Gaspar (Jul 16)