Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Email Appliances
From: Paul Robertson <proberts () patriot net>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:43:34 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Mikael Olsson wrote:
[...] if you have one of those layer 8[1] problems. [1] Political layer.That would be layer 9, since the layer 8 security problem is, simply, "users"[2]. "Execs" are typically layered above "users" in full conformance with basic layering principles[3].
No, no, no, users are physical layer devices that cause layer 8 problems. Execs are indistinguishable from users at the physical layer, more polished at the presentation layer, but originate much, much more layer 8 traffic[1]. Paul [1] I originally read that as users(2), but my system happily told me: No entry for users in section 2 of the manual. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions proberts () patriot net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." probertson () trusecure com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Email Appliances Behm, Jeffrey L. (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Paul Robertson (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Richard Threadgill (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Paul Robertson (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Mikael Olsson (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Paul Robertson (Aug 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Email Appliances Marcus J. Ranum (Aug 02)
- Reverse Inspecting Proxy Definition Paul Timmerman (Aug 05)
- Stealth Firewall Definition Paul Timmerman (Aug 05)
- Re: Email Appliances Richard Threadgill (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Paul Robertson (Aug 02)