Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY
From: Ng Pheng Siong <ngps () post1 com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:27:14 +0800
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 04:33:02PM -0500, agetchel () kde state ky us wrote:
you need to think about patching your boxes and using a reverse application proxy that can detect attacks which may be used in the defacement process (such as Unicode attacks or, like I mentioned above, buffer overflow attacks).
Reverse proxies break X.509 cert-based client authentication. -- Ng Pheng Siong <ngps () post1 com> * http://www.post1.com/home/ngps _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY agetchel (Feb 20)
- Re: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY Darren Reed (Feb 20)
- Re: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY Ng Pheng Siong (Feb 21)
- Re: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY Robert Collins (Feb 25)
- Re: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY Ng Pheng Siong (Feb 26)
- Reversise Proxies? (was Re: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY) Robert Collins (Feb 26)
- Re: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY Robert Collins (Feb 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY Bill_Royds (Feb 21)
- RE: Next Generation Security Architecture - TO MODERATOR - CORRECTED COPY MONTENEGRO,FERNANDO (HP-Canada,ex1) (Feb 26)