Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security
From: Wozz <wozz+firewall-wizards () wookie net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 12:50:09 -0700
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 07:57:46AM +0100, Rodney van den Oever wrote:
While many may believe it should be the ISP's responsibility to protectusers fromthemselves, I disagree. I *do* think that all ISPs (dialup or otherwise)have a responsibility to >provide some basic information about things users can do to protect themselves. Simple >things like not running any unnecessary services, disabling (or taking steps to secure) File >Sharing, and definately not running programs from untrusted sources. Possible new market here: 1. Cable modems incorporating filters. This modem could be managed by the ISP (of course this has its disadvantages, not very secure, managed service too expensive).
The DOCSIS cable modem specifications have IP filters incorporated, its only a matter of time before most all systems are upgraded to DOCSIS.
Current thread:
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Rodney van den Oever (Nov 01)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Wozz (Nov 01)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Michael Cassidy (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Rodney van den Oever (Nov 01)
- RE: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Keller Dennis (DDSP) (Nov 01)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Joseph S D Yao (Nov 01)
- RE: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Michael Cassidy (Nov 02)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Steven Osman (Nov 01)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Wozz (Nov 01)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security REID FOX (Nov 01)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Joseph S D Yao (Nov 02)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Robert Graham (Nov 01)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Newspaper Article about Cable Modem security Wozz (Nov 01)