Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: NT-based firewalls
From: "Baribault, Gary" <gary.baribault () videotron net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 09:30:25 -0500
Hi Mitch, here we use Gauntlet for NT and it works find, it really depends on what you want to do, but dont ignore Gauntlet from NAI. I havent tried to install it on Win2K yet, I am on the NAI beta program and they havent talked about Win2K yet. I dont expect anyone will look at it until 1Q2K. For you linux modem issue, I have gotten RH5.2, 6.0 and 6.1 to firewall, Dial up with a USR external modem without issues. I had tried to get various internal 'Non Name brand' modems to work without success. Are you trying to get a stand alone machine to dial, or route thru a dialup for many machines? If it is the latter, I do that and ude a program called DialD and it works great. Reply with questions if you like. Gary Baribault -----Original Message----- From: owner-firewall-wizards () lists nfr net [mailto:owner-firewall-wizards () lists nfr net]On Behalf Of Mitch Dickinson Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 1:47 PM To: firewall-wizards () nfr net Subject: NT-based firewalls Hi guys, I've been following the list for a few months now, but this is my first post. Anyway, I'd like to get some opinions on the absolute best firewall for the NT platform--more specifically for a win2k machine. I've heard some very good things about NetGuard's Guardian, however I seem to be unable to install the Agent part of the package. Perhaps it's just operator error (very possible!!)?? I have several linux machines in my little LAN here, but I am having some problems getting any kind of modems to work right with both linux and my isp. My final objective is to use linux as a firewall and masq all my other machines. At any rate, I would apreciate any suggestions/optinons you guys can give me. Thanks. Mitch
Current thread:
- NT-based firewalls Mitch Dickinson (Nov 10)
- Re: NT-based firewalls Bill Pennington (Nov 11)
- RE: NT-based firewalls Baribault, Gary (Nov 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: NT-based firewalls Matt Bruce (Nov 14)
- Re: NT-based firewalls chuck (Nov 18)